Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1537–1549. Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2060–2069. Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1055–1065. Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Proceeding of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries (pp. Social reference: Aggregating online usage of scientific literature in CiteULike for clustering academic resources. Mendeley-A Last.fm for research? In IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, 2008 (pp. The top 10 journal articles published in 2009 by readership on Mendeley | Mendeley Blog. Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study-web science repository.
Next-generation implications of Open Access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1319–1328. W., Rosenbaum, H., Martinson, A., & Callahan, E. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1–7.Ĭronin, B., Snyder, H. Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060–1072.īurgelman, J., Osimo, D., & Bogdanowicz, M. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data. Presented at the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics & Informetrics (pp. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometrics analysis. After reviewing them, cite what you want to use based on your own study and review.Aguillo, I. If you want to cite information from the Let's Talk section of a course, look at the references for that section. The goal is that you use the most current, credible information available.ĭo not cite or reference faculty members (unless it's one of their publications). If the guidelines have not been published recently, more current research articles covering the topic should be utilized in addition to the guidelines. You do need to look at the dates of these guidelines as often they have not been revised for quite some time. Institute of Medicine, National Institute of Health, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute).Īlso, specialty organizations that provide guidelines for management such as the American Diabetes Association (the section written for professionals only) are acceptable. Other references may be from nationally recognized organizations (i.e. Use library resources to find these journals. References should be from peer reviewed primary care and specialty care journals reflecting evidence based practice. Keep in mind the following criteria when determining what sources to use as a reference. When writing a scholarly (academic) paper, the resources cited should be scholarly as well. Usually shorter, giving a broad or superficial view of a topic Usually longer, contains in-depth coverage and/or analysis of a topic may be divided into formal sections such as: abstract, literature review, methodology, conclusions Mostly print, but may contain illustrations relating to the text such as graphs or charts
Uses everyday language for general audience Uses jargon or technical language specific to the field Reviewed by editors on staff of the magazineĬontains footnotes, endnotes, bibliography, or works cited Reviewed and evaluated by editorial board of outside scholars (peer reviewed or refereed) While there may be exceptions, below are some general guidelines you can use to determine if an article is from a scholarly or popular source.Īuthor is an expert in the field – PhD, researcher, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
